ReviewMicroorganisms2026
A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Hotspots and Progress on Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances in Bioremediation.
Review in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) are high-molecular-weight biopolymers secreted by microorganisms, showing great potential for bioremediation. However, comprehensive analyses of the development context and quantitative research on the overall trends of EPSs in bioremediation are lacking. This study conducted a systematic bibliometric analysis of microbial EPS research using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Keyword burst and thematic evolution analysis indicate a distinct thematic shift: early research focused on "structural characterization and adsorption mechanisms of EPSs", whereas current hotspots highlight interactions with emerging pollutants (e.g., microplastics, antibiotics, and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs)). EPSs significantly influence the environmental fate and removal efficiency of emerging pollutants through multiple pathways, including physical adsorption, chemical complexation, photocatalytic degradation, and electron transfer. For microplastic remediation, EPSs mediate hetero-aggregation, surface modification, and biodegradation processes. In antibiotic removal, EPSs function through biosorption, biodegradation, and photosensitized degradation. Regarding the mitigation of ARGs, EPSs can either suppress or facilitate their horizontal gene transfer, depending on their composition and environmental conditions. Additionally, as electroactive medium, EPSs play a crucial role in facilitating electron transfer, enhancing nitrogen removal, and promoting heavy metals reduction. This study systematically reviewed the current status and research hotspots of EPSs in bioremediation. However, practical applicability remains constrained by challenges such as low production yield and high costs. Future directions to address these limitations are also outlined to guide further development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.