Multidimensional Differences and Driving Mechanisms of Bacterial Communities in Urban and Rural Rivers Across China.

Lina Wu, Shuai Lu, Fanjin Ye, Jinxia Lu, Xiaoling Liu, Yanfang Tian

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lina WuLaboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment (Ministry of Education), Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.

Shuai LuLaboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment (Ministry of Education), Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China.ORCID 0009-0003-3947-1563

Fanjin YeState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science, Beijing 100012, China.

Jinxia LuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science, Beijing 100012, China.

Xiaoling LiuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science, Beijing 100012, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7526-5834

Yanfang TianState Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science, Beijing 100012, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 21306180National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 8182058Open Bidding for Selecting the Best Candidates Project of the Institute of Advanced Materials, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study systematically compared the structural, functional, pathogenic, and assembly-mechanism characteristics of bacterial communities between urban and rural rivers across China, based on integrated water quality data from 421 sampling sites and 16S rRNA gene sequences from 475 sampling sites. The results revealed that urban rivers had significantly higher nutrient concentrations and bacterial α-diversity, along with lower β-diversity. Urban rivers were enriched with organic matter-degrading phyla such as Chloroflexi and Acidobacteriota and might exhibit more complex co-occurrence networks (average degree: 85.41). In contrast, rural rivers were enriched with phyla including Firmicutes and Cyanobacteria, as well as genera such as

Indexed as

community assemblycommunity structureco-occurrence network analysisfunctional predictionplanktonic bacteria

Identifiers

PMID42354809

DOI10.3390/microorganisms14061185

PMCPMC13304416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.