Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42354776›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2026

Static Calibration and Wiring-Configuration-Dependent Performance of NiCr-Based Thin-Film Thermocouples.

Wenqian Yuan, Zhongfeng Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wenqian YuanSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Zhongfeng KangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9025-0748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thin-film thermocouples (TFTCs) offer conformal sensing junctions with minimal thermal mass, enabling rapid transient response and direct deposition on curved or moving components, which are difficult to achieve using conventional wire thermocouples in applications such as high-speed machining, electric powertrain thermal management, and fuel-cell monitoring. In practical deployment, the effective accuracy of a TFTC can also be affected by the measurement setup used for calibration and testing, particularly lead-wire material transitions, cold-junction compensation, and wiring-related thermoelectric offsets. This study presents a systematic static calibration and performance evaluation of NiCr-based TFTCs under standardised laboratory conditions, with repeated measurements across the 20-260 °C range using both copper leads and matched compensation wires. The thermoelectric output exhibits excellent linearity; temperature reconstruction against a traceable standard reference yields a maximum deviation of approximately 0.27 °C, with root-mean-square and relative errors within tight bounds. Short-term extended-range verification up to 1000 °C confirms detectable thermoelectric signal generation under the present test conditions. A calibration data packet framework containing the calibrated TFTC sample, wiring configuration, calibration coefficients, validity range, and a GUM-compliant uncertainty budget is proposed to support consistent interpretation of calibration results in future digital integration. The study therefore provides a structured calibration workflow and uncertainty-reporting basis for the tested flexible NiCr-based TFTC configurations, supporting further reliability assessment, material-level characterisation, and digital integration.

Indexed as

NiCr/NiSiSeebeck coefficientstatic calibrationtemperature measurementthin-film thermocoupleuncertainty analysis

Identifiers

PMID42354776
PMCPMC13302832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.