ReviewMicromachines2026
Process Integration and Reliability Challenges of Through-Glass Vias for Glass-Based Advanced Packaging: A Focused Review.
Review in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in chiplet architectures, heterogeneous integration, 2.5D/3D packaging, high-performance computing, and RF applications have increased the demand for high-density vertical interconnects and low-loss packaging platforms. Glass substrates have attracted considerable attention for next-generation advanced packaging because of their low dielectric loss, high dimensional stability, smooth surface, and compatibility with large-area panel-level processing. Through-glass vias (TGVs) are essential vertical interconnect structures that enable the electrical integration of glass substrates. This focused review summarizes TGV technologies for glass-based advanced packaging from the perspectives of via formation, seed layer deposition, metallization, Cu filling, defect formation, reliability, and plugging-based alternative architectures. Representative TGV formation methods, including laser drilling, selective laser etching, laser-induced deep etching, wet/dry etching, and photosensitive glass processing, are compared. Metallization approaches based on sputtering, electroless plating, ALD/CVD, and hybrid processes are discussed together with Cu electroplating strategies such as conformal plating, bottom-up filling, pulse or pulse-reverse plating, and engineered-geometry filling. Key defects, including voids, seams, pinch-off, seed discontinuity, Cu/glass interfacial delamination, glass cracking, and Cu protrusion, are reviewed in relation to thermomechanical reliability. Finally, polymer/dielectric plugging, plugging/re-drilling, conductive paste plugging, and hybrid Cu/plugging structures are discussed as application-specific alternatives for balancing electrical performance, reliability, manufacturability, yield, and cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.