ArticleMicromachines2026
Flexible In-Sensor Computing Strain Sensor for Lower-Limb Gait Recognition.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flexible strain sensors have attracted considerable attention in gait recognition owing to their ability to adhere directly to the skin near joints and transduce local deformation. In existing work, however, sensor placement and orientation are largely determined by anatomical experience, while multi-channel classification still relies on back-end digital processors, whose power consumption and latency constrain system practicality in wearable scenarios. This paper presents an integrated design path that proceeds from skin-mechanics theory through sensor-layout optimization to analog-domain front-end inference. On the layout side, the lines-of-non-extension (LoNE) theory is employed to convert the selection of sensor attachment angles from empirical judgment into a calculable mechanics problem; guided by the spatial course of LoNE in the ankle and knee regions, the positions and angles of the nine sensors are determined individually-channels perpendicular to the LoNE capture maximum strain, channels offset by 45 degrees supplement non-sagittal-plane information, and a channel aligned along the LoNE provides a near-zero-strain reference. On the circuit side, the mathematical equivalence between the weighted summation of a linear classifier and Kirchhoff's current law (KCL) nodal current superposition is exploited to map the classification operation onto current aggregation in an analog circuit, yielding an in-sensor computing (ISC) front end in which the nine-channel weighted summation is completed in a single analog step. The sensors are fabricated by screen-printing a liquid-metal-polymer composite conductive ink onto a TPU film substrate, with a gauge factor RSD of 6.8% and a tensile linearity R2>0.99. Using walking, running, and stair descent as verification targets, the analog classifier reaches 99% accuracy at the circuit-level functional-verification stage. On real multi-subject data, it achieves 87.0%±8.4% accuracy under intra-subject cross-session validation, with an analog-domain inference response faster than 100μs. This design path is not bound to a specific joint or sensor material; when the layout methodology is extended to additional joint regions and the circuit architecture incorporates multiple outputs to cover more classification categories, the same workflow remains applicable, offering a promising low-power, lightweight technical solution for wearable motion monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.