ReviewMicromachines2026
Comprehensive Review of Research Progress on Trajectory Planning and Weld Seam Tracking in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing.
Review in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) has emerged as a promising technology for producing large-scale metal components due to its high deposition efficiency, low material cost, and design flexibility. However, the widespread industrial adoption of WAAM is hindered by challenges in geometric accuracy, process stability, and defect control, which are closely related to two critical aspects: trajectory planning and real-time weld seam tracking. This review provides a comprehensive and critical analysis of recent advances in both fields, with an emphasis on their interconnection rather than treating them as separate research streams. Unlike existing reviews that primarily summarize path planning algorithms or image processing techniques in isolation, this paper explicitly examines the integration challenges and synergistic potential between offline trajectory optimization and online vision-based monitoring. Key topics include adaptive path strategies for sharp corners and intersections, interlayer filling methods to mitigate heat accumulation and residual stress, as well as passive and active visual sensing technologies for molten pool characterization and defect detection. The review further identifies a persistent gap in closed-loop systems that combine real-time image feedback with dynamic path replanning. Based on the analysis of representative studies, current limitations are discussed and future research directions are proposed, including the development of digital twins, multi-modal data fusion, and reinforcement learning-based adaptive control. This review offers a distinct perspective aimed at advancing intelligent, high-precision WAAM systems for complex metal components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.