ArticleMicromachines2026
Active-Learning-Guided Acoustic Metamaterial Resonators for Low-Frequency Noise Suppression and Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low-frequency traffic noise below 500 Hz is difficult to mitigate because its long wavelengths require impractically large conventional resonators. Here, we report an active-learning-guided inverse-design approach for scalable phononic-crystal-based acoustic metamaterial resonators that simultaneously suppress low-frequency noise transmission and harvest acoustic energy. The approach combines Gaussian process regression surrogate modeling with genetic algorithm optimization to efficiently explore high-dimensional cavity geometries. By iteratively retraining the surrogate with FEM-validated designs, the active-learning process guides the search toward high-performance structures while reducing costly FEM evaluations compared with conventional GA optimization. After geometric scaling, the 2.5D prototype derived from the nine-point optimized cavity achieved a pressure amplification factor of approximately 20 near 490 Hz, while the revolved 3D cavity exhibited amplification exceeding 30 and a transmission loss of approximately 14 dB near the target frequency. Integrated with a mass-loaded five-PZT stack, the device generated 5.5 V
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.