ArticleMicromachines2026
Experiment and Simulation Study of Wheel Angle on the Ultra-Precision Scribing Quality of LCD Glass Panels.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the effect of scribing wheel angle on the scribing behavior of LCD glass, an SPH-based numerical model was established in LS-DYNA and validated against experimental results for reaction force and median crack depth. The results show that the model can accurately capture the mechanical response and crack propagation during the scribing process. At a scribing depth of 10 μm, the maximum relative errors between simulation and experiment were 5.17% for reaction force and 2.36% for median crack depth. The results for the 110° scribing wheel indicate that median cracks mainly initiate and propagate rapidly during the penetration stage, while the median crack depth becomes nearly stable after the preset depth is reached, and the subsequent rolling stage has little influence on further crack growth. As the wheel angle increases from 90° to 140°, the experimental mean peak reaction force increases from 2.66 N to 9.97 N, the maximum effective stress increases from 374.4 MPa to 732.8 MPa, and the median crack depth increases from 68 μm to 97 μm. Experimental observations further show that small wheel angles tend to cause debris accumulation and edge chipping, whereas excessively large wheel angles are likely to induce lateral cracks. Overall, a wheel angle of about 110° provides better cross-sectional quality, surface quality, and crack controllability for 0.2 mm-thick LCD glass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.