ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Long-Term Care Planning and Sustainability of the Care System in the Region.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis study examines the relationship between user preferences, spatial accessibility, and the financial sustainability of long-term care (LTC) systems, with a focus on Slovenia and the Posavje region. The analysis compares different care models, including long-term home care (LTHC), institutional care, and community-based housing solutions such as sheltered housing and "silver villages".
methodsA mixed-methods approach was applied, combining qualitative interviews, survey data, spatial analysis, mobility-related operational assessment, and cost estimation. The survey included 1005 individuals, of whom 475 provided valid responses. Statistical analysis was conducted using chi-square tests and the Agresti-Caffo method to examine differences in care preferences and selected proportions across respondent groups.
resultsStatistically significant differences in LTC preferences across age groups were identified. Most respondents preferred care options located close to their homes, with the majority unwilling to relocate more than 10 km and a substantial share preferring distances below 5 km. The findings further indicate that travel-related costs for care providers in rural areas are considerable and, in the Municipality of Krško, comparable to the estimated monthly housing costs in specialized community-based units. Cost comparisons suggest that reductions in travel-related operational costs could offset a substantial share of the estimated housing-related costs.
conclusionsThe results indicate that sustainable LTC systems require not only adequate service capacity and funding but also spatially coordinated care models aligned with user preferences and long-term sustainability. The findings contribute to strategic LTC planning and support the development of integrated, community-based care systems in geographically dispersed regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.