ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
In Situ Gel Formation, Pore Network Evolution and Mechanical Degradation of Red Sandstone Under Chemical-Wet-Dry Cycles.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates in situ hydrogel formation and its regulating effect on multiscale damage evolution in red sandstone subjected to chemical-wet-dry cycles. Uniaxial compression, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive spectroscopy, mercury intrusion porosimetry, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry tests were performed to characterize mechanical degradation, mineral alteration, pore-network evolution, ion migration, and gel micromorphology. By combining multiscale experimental characterization with a segmented statistical damage constitutive model, this study describes the hydrogel-mediated damage evolution of red sandstone under chemical-wet-dry cycles. The mechanical properties of red sandstone show nonlinear degradation, with a deterioration order of acidic > alkaline > neutral, and this effect intensifies with increasing cycle number. After 15 cycles at pH = 3, the compressive strength and elastic modulus decreased by 38.21% and 27.12%, respectively. Both acidic and alkaline environments promoted pore development in red sandstone. After 15 cycles at pH = 3, the porosity increased from 21.51% to 24.51%, and the most probable pore diameter shifted from 21.32 μm to 25.88 μm. The porosity increased by 2.86% at pH = 11, and in situ hydrogels formed under alkaline conditions partially filled pores and inhibited crack propagation. The developed model effectively reproduced the mechanical evolution of red sandstone, with all fitted results showing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.