ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Clinical Outcomes Associated with a Propolis-Based Nano-Formulated Bioadhesive Oral Gel: A Retrospective Case Series and Non-Randomized Controlled Study in Patients with Intellectual Disabilities.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A propolis-based nano-formulated bioadhesive oral gel (NBF gel) containing vitamins C and E has been proposed as a supportive topical therapy for oral mucosal lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with the use of the gel during a 15-year institutional clinical experience and to assess its adjunctive effect on periodontal status in patients with intellectual disabilities. The study consisted of two components: a retrospective observational case series and a non-randomized controlled clinical study. In the retrospective component, 295 patients (219 females and 76 males) received topical NBF gel treatment for various oral mucosal conditions, including xerostomia-associated mucositis, inflammatory lesions, aphthous ulcers, herpes infections, glossodynia, leukoplakia, erythroplakia, and post-surgical conditions. Treatment response was assessed descriptively using patient-reported symptom improvement combined with clinical evaluation. Overall, treatment was considered successful in 265/295 patients (89.8%), while 14/295 patients (4.7%) were classified as ineffective and 16/295 patients (5.4%) as inconclusive. More favorable responses were observed in inflammatory and post-treatment lesions than in potentially premalignant or neuropathic conditions. In the controlled periodontal component, 40 patients with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities were allocated into a control group performing toothbrushing alone and a test group additionally receiving topical NBF gel application. Periodontal status was assessed using the Basic Periodontal Examination (BPE) index at baseline and after 1 and 2 weeks. Adjunctive gel application was associated with greater improvement in periodontal status compared with toothbrushing alone. No clinically relevant adverse effects were documented during the observation period; however, because adverse events were not assessed using a predefined safety-monitoring protocol, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. The present findings suggest that the investigated nano-formulated bioadhesive oral gel may represent a potentially useful adjunctive topical therapy in selected oral mucosal and periodontal conditions. Further randomized controlled studies with standardized objective outcome measures are required to confirm these preliminary findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.