Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42354305›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Excluded Lives: Migrant Status and Access to Healthcare in South Africa.

Alex Asakitikpi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alex AsakitikpiFaculty of Humanities, The Independent Institute of Education, Johannesburg 1724, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While South Africa's Constitution guarantees the right to healthcare for all who live in the country, there are still inequities that affect vulnerable groups. Based on migration status, this paper examines how discrimination intersects with structural and institutional practices to produce unequal access to healthcare services for black foreign migrants and asylum seekers in South Africa. Desk reviews of policy frameworks, relevant academic literature, and documented case reports were used to analyze the disconnect that exists in South Africa's rights-based legal commitments and the lived realities of foreigners in the country. Adopting a theoretical framework that integrates structural violence, intersectionality, and bureaucratic discretion, the findings are discussed by conceptualizing discrimination as a structural and interpersonal determinant of health. The findings suggest that the experiences of foreign nationals regarding access to healthcare services are not incidental but embedded within complex socio-political dynamics of scarce resources, institutional practices, and institutional ambiguity. The consequences of these inequities involve delayed care-seeking and increased vulnerability to preventable diseases among black immigrants, with a broader public health risk. Drawing from the study, policy clarity is recommended, and the strengthening of accountability mechanisms to ensure equitable access to healthcare in the country.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityTransients and MigrantsHumansRefugeesSouth Africablack foreign nationalshealthcare accessmedical xenophobiaSouth Africastructural discriminationundocumented migrants

Identifiers

PMID42354305
PMCPMC13300104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.