ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
A Detailed Study on the Public and Health Worker Perception and Level of Knowledge on the Topic of Radiation and Nuclear Energy in Oman.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background radiation and nuclear applications are deeply embedded in modern life. With the continuous advancement in nuclear techniques, daily radiation exposure is commonplace. The level of knowledge within this field among the general public must therefore be assessed to ensure that fundamental and essential information on radiation and nuclear energy is attained and to prevent the spread of misinformation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the level of knowledge and awareness of this topic among the general public in Oman. The study was performed using a cross-sectional survey specifically designed to measure the knowledge of different aspects in the field of radiation and nuclear applications. We achieved this aim by assessing the level of knowledge among the general public and medical professionals. Overall, 500 individuals participated in the study, 75 of whom were from the medical field. The results demonstrate varying levels of knowledge on this topic. In general, the public and medical professionals show a high level of confidence in basic information; however, the level of knowledge and confidence decreases to intermediate and, in some cases, low levels with questions at fundamental and intermediate levels of knowledge. This decrease was clearly observed among topics related to the nature of radiation, the origin of radiation, radiation protection, and radiation applications. Our findings demonstrate conclusively that the public and medical professionals in Oman have limited knowledge in this field; therefore, appropriate measures must be implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.