Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42354232›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Systematic Worldwide Review on the Performance of Non-Invasive Exhalation-Based Methods for the Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis.

Jeel Moya-Salazar, Gianella S Liviapoma-Rojas, Carlos Aliaga-Refulio, Eliane A Goicochea-Palomino, Maria Jesús Moya-Salazar, Marx E Morales-Martinez, Dante Espinoza-Morriberrón

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeel Moya-SalazarFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Señor de Sipan, Chiclayo 14002, Peru.
Gianella S Liviapoma-RojasSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Lima 51001, Peru.
Carlos Aliaga-RefulioSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Lima 51001, Peru.
Eliane A Goicochea-PalominoFaculties of Health Science, Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Lima 51001, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-4750-7496
Maria Jesús Moya-SalazarFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Señor de Sipan, Chiclayo 14002, Peru.
Marx E Morales-MartinezFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima 51001, Peru.
Dante Espinoza-MorriberrónSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Lima 51001, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is a chronic disease diagnosed through invasive methods that can worsen patients' health. Moreover, this disease is diagnosed in terminal stages, when the damage is already widespread and irreversible, which makes it necessary to have minimally invasive diagnostic methods with high performance. The aim was to compare research on non-invasive methods, respiratory footprint, and volatile organic compounds for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis through patient exhalation. Following the PRISMA guidelines, systematic searches were conducted in 13 databases. We could identify 17,454 documents between 2009 and 2022. Inclusion criteria comprised original investigations using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS), Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometer (IMR-MS), and e-nose for liver fibrosis diagnosis. We considered the precision, specificity, and sensitivity of each test and the methodological quality of each study according to the PEDro guideline. Seven investigations were included. Four (57%) studies used GC-MS, and two (28.6%) used e-nose. The most commonly used gold standard was liver biopsy, and all studies were of European origin, with only adult populations. Three (42%) studies had a specificity >90%, and five (71.4%) had a sensitivity between 85 and 100%. Isoprene is the most significant and distinguishable biomarker for liver fibrosis diagnosis. Five (71.4%) studies had high methodological quality. GC-MS is the most used technique for detecting liver fibrosis, and isoprene is the most frequent volatile organic compound (VOC) found in the exhalation of patients with liver fibrosis. More studies are needed in areas with high risk and prevalence of hepatic fibrosis.

Indexed as

Breath TestsLiver CirrhosisBiomarkersElectronic NoseGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansSensitivity and SpecificityVolatile Organic CompoundsBiomarkersVolatile Organic Compoundsbiomarkere-noseliver fibrosisnon-invasiverespiratory footprintVOC

Identifiers

PMID42354232
PMCPMC13300345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.