SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Systematic Worldwide Review on the Performance of Non-Invasive Exhalation-Based Methods for the Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver fibrosis is a chronic disease diagnosed through invasive methods that can worsen patients' health. Moreover, this disease is diagnosed in terminal stages, when the damage is already widespread and irreversible, which makes it necessary to have minimally invasive diagnostic methods with high performance. The aim was to compare research on non-invasive methods, respiratory footprint, and volatile organic compounds for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis through patient exhalation. Following the PRISMA guidelines, systematic searches were conducted in 13 databases. We could identify 17,454 documents between 2009 and 2022. Inclusion criteria comprised original investigations using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS), Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometer (IMR-MS), and e-nose for liver fibrosis diagnosis. We considered the precision, specificity, and sensitivity of each test and the methodological quality of each study according to the PEDro guideline. Seven investigations were included. Four (57%) studies used GC-MS, and two (28.6%) used e-nose. The most commonly used gold standard was liver biopsy, and all studies were of European origin, with only adult populations. Three (42%) studies had a specificity >90%, and five (71.4%) had a sensitivity between 85 and 100%. Isoprene is the most significant and distinguishable biomarker for liver fibrosis diagnosis. Five (71.4%) studies had high methodological quality. GC-MS is the most used technique for detecting liver fibrosis, and isoprene is the most frequent volatile organic compound (VOC) found in the exhalation of patients with liver fibrosis. More studies are needed in areas with high risk and prevalence of hepatic fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.