Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42354215›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Microalgae as Future Foods: Unlocking Their Potential and Overcoming Barriers to Market Adoption and Commercialization.

Tatiele C do Nascimento, Christian R Lugcheer, Luisa C Schetinger, Rafaela Basso Sartori, Mariany Costa Deprá, Adriane T Schneider, Andressa S Fernandes, Leila Q Zepka, Eduardo Jacob-Lopes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tatiele C do NascimentoBioprocess Intensification Group, Department of Food Technology and Science, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil.
Christian R LugcheerBioprocess Intensification Group, Department of Food Technology and Science, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil.
Luisa C SchetingerBioprocess Intensification Group, Department of Food Technology and Science, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-7187-1328
Rafaela Basso SartoriBioprocess Intensification Group, Department of Food Technology and Science, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil.
Mariany Costa DepráBioprocess Intensification Group, Department of Food Technology and Science, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4557-2179
Adriane T SchneiderBioprocess Intensification Group, Department of Food Technology and Science, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0002-8173-7129
Andressa S FernandesNutrition and Food Service Research Center, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Silva Jardim 136, Santos 11015-020, Brazil.
Leila Q ZepkaBioprocess Intensification Group, Department of Food Technology and Science, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5075-2994
Eduardo Jacob-LopesBioprocess Intensification Group, Department of Food Technology and Science, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4049-7640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over 70 years, microalgae have been considered promising ingredients for developing sustainable, nutritionally rich foods. Their high protein content, presence of essential amino acids, fatty acids, natural pigments, and a myriad of bioactive compounds position them as potential alternatives to conventional ingredient sources. However, despite their significant potential, the large-scale incorporation of microalgae into food products remains limited. This study presents a critical analysis of the main challenges associated with the use of microalgae in the food industry. Key bottlenecks include high production costs, technological difficulties related to biomass processing, and challenges in extracting desirable compounds. Additionally, the strong flavor, odor, and intense coloration of microalgal biomass can negatively affect sensory acceptance in food products. Other limitations involve scalability issues in cultivation systems, risks of contamination during production, and regulatory constraints related to food safety approval. Consumer perception and limited familiarity with microalgae-based foods also contribute to slower market adoption. Therefore, although microalgae represent a promising and sustainable food resource, overcoming technological, economic, and sensory barriers is essential for their broader integration into the food industry and for achieving successful market consolidation.

Indexed as

algaefood industry challengesinnovative foodsmarket adoptionsustainable food sources

Identifiers

PMID42354215
PMCPMC13298169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.