ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Precise Extrusion of Sweet Potato (
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) food printing, a relatively new food-processing method, was explored using gelatinized sweet potato starch (SPS) as a food ink. Prior to the production of intricate 3D shapes, this study focused on the precise extrusion of filaments, specifically the optimization of the printing conditions for nozzle diameters of 1.5 and 4.0 mm to produce filaments with an acceptable appearance and size. The rheological and mechanical properties of the (SPS) sol were also determined to describe the extrudability and shape retention of the food materials. The optimization process employed the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and a desirability function to generate mathematical models of the width and height of the filaments as functions of the moisture content, the print temperature, and the print speed. The generated mathematical models were used to determine the optimum printing conditions. Hence, for the 1.5 mm nozzle, the optimum condition was at 82% moisture content, 57 °C print temperature, and 10 mm/s print speed, with a desirability of 0.842. In contrast, for the 4.0 mm nozzle, the optimum condition was at 82.3% moisture content, 50 °C print temperature, and 5 mm/s print speed, with a desirability of 0.911. The optimized filaments are expected to be used in 3D food printing to create 3D shapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.