ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Immature Honey as a Quality Challenge in Global Apicultural Production.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analytical Strategies for the Detection of Pesticides, Antibiotics, and Heavy Metals in Honey: Current Advances and Implications for Food Safety.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Honey maturity is increasingly discussed in relation to product integrity, fair trade, and the classification of immature honey production as a form of adulteration. This narrative critical review examines honey maturity using evidence from peer-reviewed microbiological, physicochemical, and metabolomic studies, combined with an analysis of international and European regulatory frameworks, including Codex Alimentarius CXS 12-1981, Council Directive 2001/110/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, and Regulation (EC) No 852/2004. Particular attention is given to the interpretation of osmophilic yeast counts, water activity (aw), moisture content, comb cell capping, fermentation, and technological dehumidification. The reviewed evidence indicates that osmophilic yeasts are natural components of honey and that their presence, expressed as colony-forming units per gram (CFU/g), should not be treated as an independent non-compliance criterion in the absence of active fermentation. Existing honey standards define compositional and quality requirements, including moisture, hydroxymethylfurfural, enzymatic activity, and absence of fermentation or effervescence, but do not establish a honey-specific CFU/g limit for yeasts. On this basis, the review formulates a functional maturity assessment framework integrating aw, moisture, enzymatic indicators, and metabolomic biomarkers. The proposed framework is presented as a conceptual model derived from the synthesis of the existing literature and requiring further multilaboratory validation prior to adoption in official control practice. This approach may improve proportionality in honey quality assessment and reduce the risk of misclassifying microbiologically stable honeys as immature or adulterated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.