ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
OPTIFARM: Benchmarking YOLO Architectures for Location-Robust Potato Quality Detection.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Potato sorting in post-harvest processing relies heavily on manual visual inspection, which is physically demanding, subjective, and insufficiently scalable for modern packing lines. This study investigates the feasibility of a low-cost RGB-based optical inspection system for automated potato quality detection using deep learning-based object detection. A controlled imaging platform was constructed using commodity hardware, and a dataset of 19,805 manually annotated instances across 1361 images was collected from two geographically distinct farm locations in Slovenia. A systematic benchmark of 25 model configurations spanning five YOLO architecture families-YOLOv8, YOLOv9, YOLOv10, YOLOv11, and YOLO26-was conducted across three practical quality classes (Edible, Feed, Rotten) using a strict cross-location evaluation protocol in which models were trained on one location and tested on a completely unseen second location. All models achieved strong in-distribution performance (F1 ≥ 0.906), but showed considerable variation under cross-location conditions, with external F1 ranging from 0.792 to 0.918. The yolo26_l configuration achieved the best cross-location performance (F1 = 0.918, mAP@0.5:0.95 = 0.816, ΔF1 = 0.029), demonstrating that transferable representations are achievable under a standard supervised training protocol. Per-class analysis identified feed detection as the primary generalization bottleneck. The results confirm that affordable RGB-based sorting systems are technically feasible and highlight cross-location evaluation as an essential protocol for assessing real-world deployment readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.