Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42354037›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Predicting and Co-Optimizing the Taste and Aroma of Green Tea During Spreading Using the TabPFN Model.

Haotian Qian, Xinyao Yang, Pengcheng Zheng, Shengpeng Wang, Rui Hu, Junyi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haotian QianCollege of Intelligent Science and Engineering, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China.
Xinyao YangCollege of Intelligent Science and Engineering, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China.ORCID 0009-0002-7796-4679
Pengcheng ZhengInstitute of Fruit and Tea, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China.
Shengpeng WangInstitute of Fruit and Tea, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China.
Rui HuCollege of Intelligent Science and Engineering, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China.
Junyi ChenCollege of Intelligent Science and Engineering, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China.

Funding

Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2025EBA037Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province 2025BBB053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate how spreading conditions affect green tea taste and aroma and to develop a generalizable prediction model from small data for process optimization, this study integrated SEM, non-targeted dual-omics, and TabPFN to systematically analyze Echa No. 10 spreading. A central composite design was used. Dehydration-induced mechanical stress altered cell membrane permeability, driving non-volatile taste compound transformation and volatile aroma release. Two chemical-sensory proxies, relative polyphenol-to-amino acid ratio (R-PAR) and floral intensity index (FII), were established using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS) and headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). A prediction model was built with these indicators and TabPFN. Multi-objective optimization yielded optimum conditions: initial moisture 76.8%, temperature 26.2 °C, relative humidity 61.5%, air speed 0.85 m/s, achieving R-PAR 0.465 and FII 125.70. Compared with response surface methodology (RSM), partial least squares regression (PLSR), and support vector regression (SVR), TabPFN showed prediction R

Indexed as

green teamachine learningnon-targeted metabolomicsprocess optimizationspreadingTabPFN

Identifiers

PMID42354037
PMCPMC13298301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.