ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Superfine Grinding for Edible Powders: Mechanisms, Quality Regulation, Limitations, and Synergistic Strategies.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Edible powders are important food ingredients, and their quality strongly affects processability, stability, and nutrient delivery. Compared with conventional grinding, superfine grinding enables particle-size reduction to the micron or submicron scale and has shown considerable potential for improving the physicochemical and functional properties of food powders. This review summarizes five representative superfine grinding technologies and discusses how different mechanical force fields regulate powder quality through changes in particle size, specific surface area, cell-wall integrity, and macromolecular structure. Current evidence indicates that superfine grinding can improve hydration behavior, dissolution, the release of bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, and in vitro bioaccessibility, but these effects are highly dependent on raw-material characteristics and processing conditions. At the same time, excessive micronization may induce particle agglomeration, thermal degradation of sensitive components, sensory deterioration, high energy consumption, and potential safety concerns related to ultrafine particles. Therefore, the performance of a single grinding technology is often constrained by intrinsic physicochemical and engineering limitations. Recent studies suggest that combining superfine grinding with pretreatment, interfacial stabilization, or encapsulation strategies can improve powder stability and functionality more effectively than grinding alone. Future research should focus on standardized evaluation systems, mechanistic clarification across food matrices, and integrated process design for industrial application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.