ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Language Learning Activities in Educational Settings Incrementally Predict Language Ability Beyond Daily Conversation in Preschoolers with Cochlear Implants: A Comparative Study with Normal-Hearing Peers.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis study examined how different types of language activities in educational settings predict language ability in preschoolers with cochlear implants (CIs) versus normal-hearing (NH) peers. Predictor variables included two dimensions of language activities (language learning activities: shared reading, word games, and story retelling; daily communication activities: routine conversations and free play talk), as well as auditory utilization status (awareness of sounds, perception of speech sounds, and attentive listening to teachers/peers), learning attentional state, and family socioeconomic status (SERS). The outcome variable was language ability, measured with the Mandarin Clinical Evaluation of Language for Preschoolers' Core Scale (MCELP-CS), and control variables included age and, for the CI group only, age of implantation.
methodsParticipants included 189 CI (mean age = 4.53 years, SD = 0.83) and 210 NH preschoolers (mean age = 4.64 years, SD = 0.83). All predictor and control variables were collected via teacher-reported questionnaires (self-compiled by the research team). Statistical analyses used hierarchical regression with separate models for each group.
resultsFor the CI group, after controlling for age and age of implantation, engagement in language learning activities emerged as the most stable and independent predictor of language ability. Auditory utilization status was another significant predictor, and its inclusion substantially increased the model's R
conclusionsFindings suggest that for educational rehabilitation of CI preschoolers: increasing engagement in language learning activities in classrooms may be more beneficial than relying on daily conversation or merely improving attention alone; meanwhile, auditory utilization skills should also be fostered synergistically. Importantly, language intervention models designed for NH preschoolers cannot be directly transferred to CI preschoolers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.