ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Developing and Validating a Machine Learning Model to Predict Brain Injury in Preterm Infants Using Multisource Data from the Early Postnatal Period.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundModerate-to-severe preterm brain injury (PBI), including intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), remains an important cause of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. Early risk stratification using routinely collected clinical data may help prioritize surveillance in vulnerable infants.
methodsWe retrospectively included 318 preterm infants admitted between 2015 and 2024 as the development cohort. Thirty-three candidate predictors derived from perinatal factors, first laboratory tests within 24 h of admission, and selected early hospitalization variables were evaluated. Seven machine-learning algorithms were developed using stratified 10 × 5 nested cross-validation with prespecified preprocessing, class-balancing, and feature-selection procedures. Candidate models were compared primarily using the mean fold-level area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). After model selection, the finalized LightGBM model was calibrated using Platt scaling, and its pooled out-of-fold (OOF) performance was summarized. Two prespecified thresholds (Youden and high-sensitivity) were used for risk stratification. A small independent temporal cohort of 35 infants was used for preliminary external validation.
resultsPBI occurred in 62/318 infants (19.5%) in the development cohort and 6/35 infants (17.1%) in the temporal external cohort. During candidate-model comparison, LightGBM achieved the highest mean fold-level AUROC (0.768, 95% CI 0.708-0.825). The finalized 14-feature LightGBM model, evaluated using pooled OOF predictions after Platt calibration, yielded an AUROC of 0.747 (95% CI 0.679-0.811), a PR-AUC of 0.392, and a Brier score of 0.136. At the Youden threshold (0.18), sensitivity was approximately 0.70 and specificity approximately 0.85; at the high-sensitivity threshold (0.10), sensitivity was approximately 0.95 and specificity approximately 0.50. Key predictors included ventilation status and early physiologic and laboratory indicators. In the small temporal external cohort (
conclusionsWe developed an interpretable LightGBM model using routinely available early postnatal and early hospitalization data to support risk stratification for PBI in preterm infants. The model showed moderate internal discrimination and a positive net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. Preliminary temporal external validation in a small cohort yielded highly uncertain estimates; larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm generalizability, refine calibration, and determine the most appropriate implementation strategy before routine clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.