ReviewGenes2026
Generative AI and Language Models in Human Genetics and Health: From Variant Interpretation to Clinical Decision Support.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming biological and medical research and data analysis. Beyond analyzing existing information, these models can learn complex patterns and generate new data such as realistic protein sequences, genetic variants, or clinical notes. In molecular biology, language-like sequence models can read and generate DNA, RNA, and amino acid sequences to predict genetic variant effects, design new proteins, and explore molecular functions. In medicine, large language models (LLMs) trained on biomedical literature and electronic health records (EHRs) can summarize clinical findings, identify patterns, and provide decision support for clinicians and healthcare providers. Additionally, synthetic data generation can help protect patient privacy and augment existing disease datasets. While these advances make tasks that were previously impractical possible at scale, they also carry major risks, including producing convincing but incorrect results, reflecting hidden biases in the training data, and underperforming when real-world conditions change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.