ArticleGenes2026
A Staged Whole-Blood Transcriptomic Framework Identifies a Compact Myeloid-Lymphoid Activity Score in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPeripheral-blood transcriptomic profiling can capture molecular heterogeneity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but discovery-stage signatures often show limited transportability across cohorts and validation layers. This study aimed to establish a staged whole-blood transcriptomic framework and to derive a compact, biologically interpretable activity score.
methodsPublic whole-blood bulk transcriptome cohorts were organised into discovery, public validation, and single-cell reference layers. Local orthogonal validation included a peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)/flow-cytometric cohort and an expanded whole-blood RT-qPCR validation set. Discovery-stage BloodGen3 profiling included 233 samples, comprising 170 SLE and 63 healthy controls, and endotype discovery was restricted to SLE samples. Candidate genes were compressed into two 6-gene panels, with final selection adjudicated through staged public validation.
resultsTwo working whole-blood endotypes were identified, characterised by lymphoid versus myeloid/neutrophil-inflammatory polarisation. Although pre6-any showed a marginal discovery-stage advantage, the predefined integrated public-stage adjudication favoured pre6-balanced (
conclusionsThis staged framework yielded a compact myeloid-lymphoid activity score supported across public and local validation layers. The score should be interpreted as a research-grade relative activity score and warrants prospective evaluation in SLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.