ReviewGenes2026
From Genome to Pharmacome: Current Status and Future Perspectives of Multi-Omics Integration in Traditional Chinese Medicine Research.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-throughput sequencing and multi-omics are transforming Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) research from empirical descriptions toward data-driven mechanistic analyses. Unlike earlier systems pharmacology frameworks that relied primarily on static network topology and docking-based target prediction, current multi-omics approaches integrate genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data to capture dynamic, multi-scale biological responses. This review summarizes recent progress in four related areas: (i) genomic and epigenomic dissection of geo-authentic (Daodi) medicinal materials; (ii) biosynthetic pathway elucidation for major bioactive compound classes; (iii) synthetic biology platforms for heterologous production; and (iv) systems pharmacology integration for mechanism-of-action studies. We identify a central, recurrent gap: most published multi-omics analyses remain at the level of statistical association, and the biosynthetic and pharmacological pathways inferred from such data have not been validated at the causal level. To address this, we propose a tiered experimental validation framework-from biochemical target engagement through genetic perturbation to in vivo functional confirmation-and an iterative computational-experimental feedback loop. We further outline practical priorities for future work, including standardized data formats, community-endorsed metadata checklists, and coordinated DBTL pilot projects. By connecting descriptive multi-omics patterns to experimentally testable mechanistic models, TCM research can move toward precision-oriented medicine while preserving the multi-component character of traditional formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.