Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42353785›Full record

ArticleGenes2026

Identifying Single-Cell Expression Quantitative Trait Loci Using a Bootstrap Penalized Hurdle Model.

Dongyuan Wu, Susmita Datta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dongyuan WuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Susmita DattaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7408-699X

Funding

INSiGHTS - Innovative Next Steps in Gaining Health Improvements Through Translational ScienceUM1TR005128 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DUANE A. MITCHELL, SYLVIE NAAR · 2025 to 2026
$10.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1TR005128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis links genetic variants to gene expression levels, helping to uncover how genetic variation contributes to gene regulation. While traditional eQTL analyses rely on bulk RNA-seq data, recent advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) have made it possible to detect cell-type-specific eQTLs. However, the inherent sparsity and heterogeneity of scRNA-seq data present major challenges for standard modeling approaches.

methodsIn this paper, we propose a novel statistical framework, Bootstrap Penalized Hurdle regression model (BPHurdle), designed specifically for scRNA-seq data. BPHurdle employs a hurdle modeling framework, where a logistic component accounts for the excess zeros in single-cell expression data, and a Poisson component jointly evaluates the effects of multiple SNPs on positive gene expression levels.

resultsThrough simulation studies, we show that BPHurdle achieves high accuracy and robustness in identifying regulatory variants. We further demonstrate its utility on a real dataset through a case study focusing on a subset of differentially expressed genes, where it successfully identifies reliable cell-type-specific eQTLs.

conclusionsOverall, BPHurdle offers an advanced and flexible approach for single-cell eQTL mapping, providing deeper insight into the genetic regulation of gene expression at cellular resolution.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait LociSingle-Cell AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingHumansModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisbootstrapeQTL analysishurdle modelpenalized regressionsingle-cell

Identifiers

PMID42353785
PMCPMC13299111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.