ArticleGenes2026
Integrating Multiple Correspondence Analysis and GWAS to Evaluate Reproductive Potential in Crossbred Heifers.
Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the reproductive potential of crossbred heifers from dual-purpose systems using body conformation traits and to explore their genomic associations.
methodsA total of 522 heifers from the Colombian Caribbean region were phenotyped for structural and morphological traits, including body condition score, thoracic perimeter, height at withers, body length, ischium length, back level, hoof angle, stance width, hock angle, and rump level. Continuous variables were transformed into categorical classes and analyzed using multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) to build a reproductive potential index (RPI) that was used to perform a GWAS analysis to explore genomic regions.
resultsThe first two dimensions explained 11.6% and 8.2% of the total variation, respectively, and were used to construct an RPI. Heifers with higher RPI values exhibited greater thoracic perimeter, height, body length, and ischium length and were associated with wider chest and deeper body conformation, whereas lower RPI values were related to narrower and shallower body traits. However, some structurally desirable traits, such as centered stance, optimal hoof angle, and slightly sloped rump, were not clearly associated with high RPI. Genome-wide association analysis of the RPI did not reveal significant loci, although suggestive signals were identified on BTA3 and BTA19, near RSBN1, PHTF1, and WNT9B.
conclusionsThese findings indicate that MCA-derived indices can summarize conformation-related variation in crossbred heifers, while the absence of strong associations suggests a polygenic architecture with small individual genetic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.