ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2026
Phytochemicals as NMDA Receptor Inhibitors and Their Potential for Treating Excitotoxicity-Related Neurotoxicity: A Systematic Review.
Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Excitotoxicity caused by excessive activation of glutamate receptors, particularly N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs), significantly contributes to neuronal damage in neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs), such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Huntington's diseases. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of plant extracts and phytochemicals on NMDAR-mediated excitotoxicity and to summarize their proposed neuroprotective mechanisms. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024528160). A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and PubMed identified 323 records, with an additional 7 records identified through manual searching that specifically considered in vitro and in vivo inhibitors of NMDAR excitotoxicity using plant extracts and isolated phytochemicals. Twenty-seven studies demonstrated that plant extracts and phytochemicals attenuate excitotoxicity through multiple mechanisms, including inhibition of NMDAR-induced currents, reduction of intracellular calcium influx, modulation of NMDAR expression, attenuation of oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction. However, the evidence base was largely dominated by in vitro and ex vivo studies, with limited in vivo validation, restricting translational relevance. Risk-of-bias assessment using an adapted version of the Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) Risk of Bias Tool indicated that 4 studies had a low overall risk of bias, 12 had low to moderate risk, and 11 were at moderate risk, with key limitations related to inadequate reporting of blinding, randomization, and allocation concealment. In contrast, exposure characterization, outcome assessment, and confounding control were generally strong across studies. Although the findings support the mechanistic neuroprotective potential of certain plant extracts and phytochemicals against NMDAR-mediated excitotoxicity, further well-designed in vivo and clinical studies are required to establish their therapeutic relevance for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.