ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
An Overview of the Research Status and Advances in Precision Feeding Technology and Equipment in Aquaculture.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precision feeding is an important foundation for improving production efficiency in aquaculture, reducing feed waste, mitigating water pollution, and promoting the intelligent development of aquaculture. Conventional feeding practices remain heavily dependent on operator experience and are typically executed at predetermined times or fixed ration levels. Such approaches frequently result in extensive feeding management, poor adaptability, low feed utilization efficiency, and delayed responses to environmental changes. Advances in machine vision, the Internet of Things, machine learning, deep learning, and automatic control have progressively shifted aquaculture feeding research beyond standalone automatic feeders toward integrated systems encompassing demand perception, intelligent decision-making, precise control, and equipment coordination. This paper reviews the state of the art in precision feeding technologies and equipment in aquaculture. At the technical level, it summarizes advances in feeding demand perception, intelligent feeding decision-making, and precise control and execution. At the equipment level, it reviews the main types, design features, and field application status of precision feeding equipment in intensive aquaculture, pond aquaculture, and offshore aquaculture scenarios. Despite the considerable progress achieved, the practical deployment of precision feeding still faces several limitations. Environmental disturbances, water turbidity, illumination variation, and sensor drift may compromise the reliability of feeding demand perception. Existing decision-making models frequently exhibit limited generalizability across species, growth stages, and aquaculture scenarios. Moreover, insufficient integration of sensing, decision-making, and execution restricts the development of fully closed-loop feeding systems. High initial investment, maintenance costs, and the shortage of skilled personnel further constrain the adoption of precision feeding equipment, particularly in resource-limited regions. On this basis, the main challenges including sensing accuracy, model practicability, closed-loop control, equipment reliability, and standardization, are examined. Future development trends are also discussed, covering multi-source information fusion, synergy between mechanistic models and data-driven methods, system-level closed-loop control, equipment modularization, and industrial application. This review is expected to provide a reference for subsequent research and engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.