Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42353507›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

An Overview of the Research Status and Advances in Precision Feeding Technology and Equipment in Aquaculture.

Ke Chen, Sixian Li, Tieli Lyu, Dongfang Li, Zhiqiang Zhou, Jieyu Xian, Maohua Xiao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ke ChenCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6320-5714
Sixian LiCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.
Tieli LyuCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.
Dongfang LiCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.
Zhiqiang ZhouAgricultural Mechanization Technology Promotion Station of Kunshan, Kunshan 215330, China.
Jieyu XianCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2526-6644
Maohua XiaoCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5213-1035

Funding

the Integrated Pilot Program for Agricultural Machinery R&D, Manufacturing, Promotion, and Application in Jiangsu Province JSYTH12the Jiangsu Modern Agricultural Machinery Equipment and Technology Promotion Project NJ2024-29the Jiangsu Modern Agricultural Machinery Equipment and Technology Promotion Project NJ2025-26the Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program BE2022385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision feeding is an important foundation for improving production efficiency in aquaculture, reducing feed waste, mitigating water pollution, and promoting the intelligent development of aquaculture. Conventional feeding practices remain heavily dependent on operator experience and are typically executed at predetermined times or fixed ration levels. Such approaches frequently result in extensive feeding management, poor adaptability, low feed utilization efficiency, and delayed responses to environmental changes. Advances in machine vision, the Internet of Things, machine learning, deep learning, and automatic control have progressively shifted aquaculture feeding research beyond standalone automatic feeders toward integrated systems encompassing demand perception, intelligent decision-making, precise control, and equipment coordination. This paper reviews the state of the art in precision feeding technologies and equipment in aquaculture. At the technical level, it summarizes advances in feeding demand perception, intelligent feeding decision-making, and precise control and execution. At the equipment level, it reviews the main types, design features, and field application status of precision feeding equipment in intensive aquaculture, pond aquaculture, and offshore aquaculture scenarios. Despite the considerable progress achieved, the practical deployment of precision feeding still faces several limitations. Environmental disturbances, water turbidity, illumination variation, and sensor drift may compromise the reliability of feeding demand perception. Existing decision-making models frequently exhibit limited generalizability across species, growth stages, and aquaculture scenarios. Moreover, insufficient integration of sensing, decision-making, and execution restricts the development of fully closed-loop feeding systems. High initial investment, maintenance costs, and the shortage of skilled personnel further constrain the adoption of precision feeding equipment, particularly in resource-limited regions. On this basis, the main challenges including sensing accuracy, model practicability, closed-loop control, equipment reliability, and standardization, are examined. Future development trends are also discussed, covering multi-source information fusion, synergy between mechanistic models and data-driven methods, system-level closed-loop control, equipment modularization, and industrial application. This review is expected to provide a reference for subsequent research and engineering applications.

Indexed as

aquaculturefeeding decision-makingfeeding equipmentmachine visionprecision feeding

Identifiers

PMID42353507
PMCPMC13295729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.