Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42353492›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Effects of Dietary Betaine on Growth Performance, Serum Metabolites, and Meat Quality of Pigs: A Meta-Analysis.

Guanzu Liu, Yuxuan Wang, Xinyang Dong, Haichao Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guanzu LiuSchool of Life Sciences and Food Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.
Yuxuan WangSchool of Life Sciences and Food Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.
Xinyang DongCollege of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0006-7999
Haichao WangSchool of Life Sciences and Food Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4696-8394

Funding

Hebei Natural Science Foundation C2023402068National Natural Science Foundation of China 32302780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Betaine, functioning as a key methyl donor and organic osmolyte, is widely used to improve growth performance and carcass characteristics of swine. However, existing studies show inconsistent results, and the optimal supplementation dose remains unclear. This study systematically quantified the impact of betaine supplementation on the growth performance, serum metabolites, and meat quality of swine via a meta-analysis and meta-regression of 31 randomized controlled trials. The standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using a random-effects model, while a subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. The analysis revealed that dietary betaine supplementation significantly increased the average daily gain and reduced the feed conversion ratio, while the average daily feed intake remained unaffected. A subgroup analysis indicated that the optimal dose for improving feed conversion was approximately 1250 mg/kg, whereas this efficacy was attenuated in the high-dose cohorts. Furthermore, betaine significantly reduced serum urea levels, muscle shear force, drip loss, and cooking loss. Conversely, the backfat thickness and serum lipid indices showed no significant changes. The meta-regression confirmed that the breed and growth stage were the primary determinants of heterogeneity in growth performance. These findings demonstrate that betaine facilitates growth primarily by enhancing feed efficiency and protein accretion, and its beneficial effects on meat quality are mainly driven by improved tenderness and water-holding capacity.

Indexed as

betainegrowth performancemeat qualitymeta-analysisswine

Identifiers

PMID42353492
PMCPMC13295334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.