ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Fine-Mapping-Based Variant Prioritization and Genomic Prediction Enhance Genetic Analyses of Teat Traits in Pigs.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying causal genetic variants and candidate genes underlying complex traits remains a central challenge in animal breeding and genetics. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are widely used for this purpose. However, their reliance on marginal variant effects and sensitivity to linkage disequilibrium (LD) can lead to redundant and less accurate identification of variants or genes of biological relevance. Here, we propose SNP prioritization (GWAS-based and fine-mapping-based) strategies within a unified framework, designed to improve the selection of more informative variants and candidate genes by explicitly modeling LD structure and genetic architectures of three pig teat-related traits (total teat number, teat symmetry, and teat adequacy). While GWAS prioritization favored variants with strong marginal effects, fine-mapping substantially improved joint explanatory performance and prediction accuracy. For total teat number, the best-performing fine-mapping-derived SNP subset achieved a mean PCC of 0.6599 across 10-fold cross-validation, compared with 0.3755 for GWAS-based prioritization. Similarly, for teat adequacy, the highest mean AUC increased from 0.7012 (GWAS) to 0.8547 (fine-mapping). Moreover, fine-mapping-derived SNP sets identified more coherent and trait-specific biological pathways and functionally relevant candidate genes. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that fine-mapping provides a more accurate and biologically meaningful framework for SNP and candidate gene prioritization, supporting its integration into genetic analysis and breeding applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.