ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Strategies for Reducing Antimicrobial Use in Cattle Through Gut Microbiome Modulation: A Systematic Review of Alternatives to Antibiotics.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The escalating global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has intensified efforts to identify safe, effective, and sustainable alternatives to in-feed antibiotics in livestock production. The bovine gastrointestinal microbiome plays a central role in host immunity, nutrient utilization, and disease resilience, positioning microbiome-modulating interventions as promising candidates for antimicrobial stewardship. Despite growing experimental interest, a systematic synthesis of the available evidence in cattle is lacking. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of microbiome-modulating interventions, including probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, phytogenic feed additives, essential oils, organic acids, and native rumen microbial supplements, as strategies to reduce antimicrobial use in cattle, and to characterize their effects on gut microbial diversity, fermentation characteristics, and host health and performance outcomes. A systematic search of Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost (including Academic Search Ultimate, MEDLINE with full text, and CAB Abstracts with Full text) was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies were eligible if they used cattle (dairy cattle, beef cattle, calves, or mixed production systems), employed a microbiome-modulating intervention, and reported at least one microbiological or host outcome. Seventeen peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025 were included after full-text screening. Risk of bias was assessed using an adapted SYRCLE tool, which identified moderate overall study quality; the majority of included studies were randomized controlled trials or controlled experiments, though reporting of allocation concealment and blinding was inconsistent across studies. Across the 17 included studies, five broad categories of interventions were evaluated: probiotics (n = 5 studies), prebiotics (n = 2), postbiotics and organic acids (n = 4), phytogenic additives and essential oils (n = 4), and native rumen microbial supplements (n = 2). Animals spanned neonatal dairy calves, weaned Holstein calves, dairy heifers, lactating dairy cows, and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.