Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42353436›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Observations on Anti-Predator Defense Behavior in Feral Horses in Venezuela.

Lucy Rees, Emily Kieson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucy ReesPottokas en Piornal, 10615 Piornal, Spain.
Emily KiesonEquine International, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0858-1343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apart from vigilance and flight, anti-predator defense behavior in horses has not been well documented despite its importance during natural selection. In this study, observations of a feral herd (around 140) of Venezuelan horses sympatric with puma and jaguar divided such defense into precaution and reaction. Group living and the avoidance of danger areas are precautionary measures enhanced by the stallion's vigilance and his actions to keep small foals with the band. Reactions to perceived threats comprise communication of alarm; bunching, or cohesion, as a primary response; massed flight following self-organizing principles; and reassembly of bands. Stallions usually initiated this behavioral process. Stallions' initial reactions to perceived threats were "investigation", "move away", "run away", and "stampede", and resulting herd behavior was categorized into 27 responses. Data analysis through Observation Oriented Modeling indicated that each category of initial stallion response to perceived threats was associated with a recurring pattern of subsequent herd behavior. Prominent behaviors enhanced cohesion and synchrony, as well as velocity and direction matching. A fourth observed category was the cohesive "run to band" of a startled outlying member, in which the individual's alarm might transmit to the band or the band's calm transmit to the individual. The results emphasize the importance of communication, social cohesion, and synchronous action in times of perceived threats, their continuous practice during maintenance activities, and the social needs and understanding management of domestic horses.

Indexed as

alarmanti-predator defensehorsepumasocial cohesion

Identifiers

PMID42353436
PMCPMC13295745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.