ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
An Ecological Framework for Interpreting the Canine Gut Microbiome.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intestinal microbiome is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of canine gastrointestinal health. However, interpreting microbiome sequencing data remains challenging because most analytical approaches rely on taxonomic descriptions, alpha diversity indices, or dysbiosis indices derived generally from a limited number of microbial ecological interpretation targets. While shotgun metagenomic approaches increasingly allow the identification of microbial communities, such analyses remain costly and are not yet widely accessible in routine veterinary settings. The objective of this study was to develop an integrative interpretation framework based on widely accessible biomarkers combining fecal calprotectin and 16S rRNA gene sequencing data. These data enabled the generation of complementary ecological dimensions of gut microbiome organization: biological inflammation assessed through fecal calprotectin, microbiological inflammatory pressure estimated through a Microbiological Inflammatory Score (MIS), and microbiome stability measured by a Microbiome Resilience Score (MRS) derived from alpha diversity, functional balance, and dominance structure. Fecal microbiome profiles obtained by 16S rRNA gene sequencing were analyzed in a real-life cohort of privately owned dogs. Alpha diversity, taxonomic weighting, abundance-dependent dominance rules, beta diversity based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, distance to a reference microbiome core, and a 16S-derived dysbiosis score were integrated into a multidimensional interpretation model. Strong ecological associations were observed between resilience, microbial diversity, and dysbiosis-related metrics. Microbiome resilience strongly correlated with Shannon diversity (Spearman ρ = 0.98,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.