Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42353383›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Light Attention Encoder-Decoder for Cattle Body Segmentation and Body Weight Estimation.

Sahilpreet Singh Mann, Halah K Shehada, Sabrina T Amorim, Dong S Ha, Gota Morota, Sook Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sahilpreet Singh MannBradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-8979-536X
Halah K ShehadaBradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-9915-0928
Sabrina T AmorimDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4130-2040
Dong S HaBradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Gota MorotaLaboratory of Biometry and Bioinformatics, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Biology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3567-6911
Sook ShinBradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8511-9198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate, non-invasive body weight estimation is essential for management and performance monitoring in beef cattle systems, yet conventional scales and manual measurements require animal handling, infrastructure, and labor. This study presents an integrated pipeline that segments cattle from overhead depth images and predicts body weight from extracted image features. The approach uses a Light Attention Encoder-Decoder (LAED) segmentation model combining depthwise separable convolutions, Gaussian Context Transformer (GCT) attention, a multi-scale dilated bottleneck, and dual heads for region and boundary prediction. Depth videos were collected using an overhead Intel RealSense D435 RGB-D camera from 60 beef heifers. To reduce animal-level leakage, leave-one-animal-out cross-validation was used for segmentation. LAED + GCT achieved 96.91% Dice (95% confidence interval (CI): 96.56-97.21%) and 94.22% IoU (95% CI: 93.58-94.77%), while operating at 33.08 frames per second. For weight prediction, biometric traits and deep features were evaluated using random forest, support vector regression, and fully connected neural networks. The best primary-metric body-weight model used biometric traits with support vector regression, achieving MAPE = 6.75%, pooled R2 = 0.68, MAE = 23.92 kg, and RMSE = 31.79 kg. Among FCNN models trained independently within each cattle-level fold, the best result used ResNet50 features and achieved MAPE = 7.76%, a pooled R2 = 0.56, an MAE = 27.60 kg, and an RMSE = 37.07 kg. The mean signed prediction bias for the biometric-SVR model was -1.04 kg, using predicted minus observed body weight, with a bootstrap 95% confidence interval of -9.63 to 7.41 kg. These results support the promise of overhead depth imaging for non-invasive cattle body segmentation and weight estimation, while larger external validation remains necessary.

Indexed as

boundary-aware segmentationconvolutional networksdepth mapsgaussian context transformerU-Net

Identifiers

PMID42353383
PMCPMC13295519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.