ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Light Attention Encoder-Decoder for Cattle Body Segmentation and Body Weight Estimation.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate, non-invasive body weight estimation is essential for management and performance monitoring in beef cattle systems, yet conventional scales and manual measurements require animal handling, infrastructure, and labor. This study presents an integrated pipeline that segments cattle from overhead depth images and predicts body weight from extracted image features. The approach uses a Light Attention Encoder-Decoder (LAED) segmentation model combining depthwise separable convolutions, Gaussian Context Transformer (GCT) attention, a multi-scale dilated bottleneck, and dual heads for region and boundary prediction. Depth videos were collected using an overhead Intel RealSense D435 RGB-D camera from 60 beef heifers. To reduce animal-level leakage, leave-one-animal-out cross-validation was used for segmentation. LAED + GCT achieved 96.91% Dice (95% confidence interval (CI): 96.56-97.21%) and 94.22% IoU (95% CI: 93.58-94.77%), while operating at 33.08 frames per second. For weight prediction, biometric traits and deep features were evaluated using random forest, support vector regression, and fully connected neural networks. The best primary-metric body-weight model used biometric traits with support vector regression, achieving MAPE = 6.75%, pooled R2 = 0.68, MAE = 23.92 kg, and RMSE = 31.79 kg. Among FCNN models trained independently within each cattle-level fold, the best result used ResNet50 features and achieved MAPE = 7.76%, a pooled R2 = 0.56, an MAE = 27.60 kg, and an RMSE = 37.07 kg. The mean signed prediction bias for the biometric-SVR model was -1.04 kg, using predicted minus observed body weight, with a bootstrap 95% confidence interval of -9.63 to 7.41 kg. These results support the promise of overhead depth imaging for non-invasive cattle body segmentation and weight estimation, while larger external validation remains necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.