ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
CRISPR Gene Tagging for Illuminating Endogenous Protein Dynamics.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endogenous gene tagging using CRISPR has changed the understanding of the role played by different proteins due to the ability to track and study proteins in their natural state. With CRISPR-based gene tagging, it is possible to insert fluorescent, luminescent, epitope, affinity, and proximity labels into the target protein at its endogenous genomic location without affecting its physiological expression and dynamics. Here, we discuss the DNA-repair mechanisms employed in endogenous gene tagging, including homology-dependent repair, NHEJ-based integration, and alternative approaches that can be used with challenging cell types. Key aspects of efficient CRISPR tagging experiments are also described. Additionally, we review recent advances in the increasing array of protein tag technologies, including fluorescent proteins, split-reporter technologies, NanoLuc/HiBiT, peptide epitopes, and proximity biotinylation enzymes. Lastly, we review the scalability of endogenous tagging approaches using multiplex editing, atlas-scale proteome tagging, iPSC-based disease modeling, and drug discovery platforms for assessing target engagement, protein degradation, phenotype screening, and mechanism of action of compounds. Although difficult in primary and pluripotent cells, new methods based on avoiding double-strand breaks, such as prime editing, PASTE, and CRISPR associated transposases, will drive the future expansion of endogenous tagging approaches. Such developments firmly set up CRISPR gene tagging as a fundamental technology in quantitative cell biology and translational pharmacology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.