Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42353261›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Complex Distribution Phenomena and Plastic Binding of Test Chemicals in Cell Culture Experiments: Exemplification by Tebufenpyrad.

Mahshid Alimohammadi, Hiba Khalidi, Elias Zgheib, Anna-Katharina Holzer, Naja Bürgers, Céline Brochot, Patrik Lundquist, Viktoria Magel, Baiba Gukalova, Edgars Liepinsh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mahshid AlimohammadiIn Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Department Inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden foundation, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.
Hiba KhalidiCertara Predictive Technologies, Level 2-Acero, 1 Concourse Way, Sheffield S1 2BJ, UK.
Elias ZgheibCertara Predictive Technologies, Level 2-Acero, 1 Concourse Way, Sheffield S1 2BJ, UK.
Anna-Katharina HolzerIn Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Department Inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden foundation, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1453-1019
Naja BürgersIn Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Department Inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden foundation, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.
Céline BrochotCertara Predictive Technologies, Level 2-Acero, 1 Concourse Way, Sheffield S1 2BJ, UK.
Patrik LundquistDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden.
Viktoria MagelIn Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Department Inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden foundation, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.
Baiba GukalovaLatvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-7057-4726
Edgars LiepinshLatvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-2213-8337
Marcel LeistIn Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Department Inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden foundation, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3778-8693

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG TRR353German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 16LW0147the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program 964537 and 101057014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biokinetic complexities (plastic sorption, protein binding, and cellular accumulation) may cause large discrepancies between nominal and biologically effective concentrations of test compounds assessed by new approach methods (NAMs). This case study was performed to explore a generally applicable workflow that addresses biokinetic complexities in the context of NAM-based hazard testing for next-generation risk assessment (NGRA). The pesticide tebufenpyrad (TEBU) is a challenging test compound, as it (i) is hydrophobic, (ii) has an intracellular target (mitochondrial respiration), and (iii) is acting at low concentrations (susceptible to biokinetic complexities). In the newly established NeuriTox-M neurotoxicity assay, based on human dopaminergic (LUHMES) neuron cultures, TEBU showed toxic effects at 20 nM. Mass spectrometric analyses of various experimental setups showed that a large fraction (75% to >90%) of TEBU was adsorbed to plastic. This effect was strongly attenuated by albumin in the medium. Cells, cultured on plastic, were considered unsuitable to assess cellular uptake. Therefore, alternatives were explored: when cells were used as suspension cultures (3%

Indexed as

PlasticsCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedHumansNeuronsPlasticsbiokineticsin vitro testingmitochondriaNAMneurotoxicityplastic binding

Identifiers

PMID42353261
PMCPMC13300673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.