ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Discovery-Driven Plasma Proteomics Identifies a Multi-Protein Signature for Amyloid PET Positivity: A Machine Learning Analysis of the Bio-Hermes Cohort.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder in which early detection remains limited by the cost and invasiveness of positron emission tomography and cerebrospinal fluid testing. We evaluated whether plasma proteomic profiles could distinguish amyloid PET-positive from amyloid PET-negative individuals using the Bio-Hermes cohort. After quality control and missing-data filtering, 988 participants and 295 proteins were analysed; 31 proteins showing group differences were used for supervised classification. Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Neural Network models were trained across four train/test splits with repeated cross-validation and class downsampling. Amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative groups differed across a subset of proteins, with five remaining significant after false discovery rate correction. Tree-based models performed most consistently, with Random Forest and Gradient Boosting achieving AUC values of 0.79-0.81 and balanced accuracy of 0.68-0.73. Eight proteins (SERPINA1, C3, CRP, APOE4, CFH, VTN, C1QTNF5, and PON1) emerged as recurring high-importance features. These findings indicate that discovery-driven plasma proteomics can identify multi-protein signatures associated with amyloid status and can complement established single-analyte blood biomarkers by adding pathway-level information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.