Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42353170›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Comparative Evaluation of Real-Time PCR, Immunochromatographic Assay, and Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method for Carbapenemase Detection in Enterobacterales Isolates.

Elif Tuğçe Güner, Cemal Çiçek, Ayfer Bakır, Murat Aral

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elif Tuğçe GünerDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Health Science Ankara Etlik City Hospital, 06170 Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8832-2201
Cemal ÇiçekDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Health Science Ankara Etlik City Hospital, 06170 Ankara, Türkiye.
Ayfer BakırDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Health Science Ankara Etlik City Hospital, 06170 Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9006-5267
Murat AralDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Health Science Ankara Etlik City Hospital, 06170 Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3576-4380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales represent a major global public health concern, and the rapid and reliable detection of carbapenemase production is of critical importance. In this study, real-time PCR was used as the reference method for carbapenemase detection, and the performance of immunochromatographic and phenotypic methods was comparatively evaluated. A total of 96 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates were included, and all were identified as carbapenemase producers by the reference method. Diagnostic performance was assessed using positive percent agreement (PPA) and overall percent agreement (OPA); negative percent agreement and negative predictive value could not be calculated due to the absence of negative isolates. The immunochromatographic test showed complete agreement with real-time PCR in detecting carbapenemase production (PPA and OPA: 100%). At the gene level, sensitivity and specificity were 100% for OXA-48 and NDM, while sensitivity for KPC was 91.7%. In the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), PPA and OPA values were 97.9% due to false-negative results observed in two isolates producing OXA-48 and NDM by the reference method, and its performance was slightly lower than that of the immunochromatographic method. These findings indicate that the immunochromatographic method is a rapid, reliable, and practical option for carbapenemase detection, particularly in OXA-48-endemic intensive care settings where rapid identification is critical for timely infection control and appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

Indexed as

Bacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeCarbapenemsChromatography, AffinityEnterobacteriaceaeReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSensitivity and SpecificityAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseCarbapenemsantimicrobial resistancecarbapenemasecarbapenem inactivation methodcarbapenem-resistant Enterobacteralesdiagnostic algorithmimmunochromatographic assayOXA-48

Identifiers

PMID42353170
PMCPMC13299616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.