ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
A Roadmap to Perfused Skin: Defining the Next Generation of Research Questions in Cutaneous Tissue Engineering.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous tissue engineering has advanced from simple coverage substitutes to increasingly complex living constructs, yet the field remains constrained by a decisive problem: timely and durable perfusion. Many engineered skin substitutes can appear vascular in static culture or in small-animal models. However, they still fail when blood flow must be established quickly enough to rescue cells across clinically relevant tissue thickness. Rather than re-catalog platforms already summarized in recent reviews, this critical narrative review reframes the field around perfusion as the master functional endpoint rather than vessel density alone. We analyze the vascularization bottleneck as a sequence, internal network formation, host inosculation, flow initiation, and perfusion stability-and use that sequence to reassess biomaterial design, cell-based strategies, immunomodulation, decellularized matrices, bioprinting, microfluidics, and prevascularization. We intentionally distinguish implantable skin substitutes from perfused in vitro platforms such as skin-on-chip systems, arguing that these are linked but non-interchangeable application spaces with different success criteria. Building on this distinction, we propose a research agenda centered on functional benchmarking of perfusion, spatiotemporal coordination of scaffold dynamics, immune-mural-lymphatic-vascular crosstalk, scalable hierarchical vascular fabrication, and predictive human test platforms. The central argument is that translation will depend not on ever more isolated pro-angiogenic interventions but on integrated systems that survive the ischemic interval, connect rapidly, tolerate blood entry, maintain a workable inflow-outflow balance, and remodel into a stable, skin-specific microvasculature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.