ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Modeling the Clockwork of Bone: A Narrative Review of Experimental Approaches to Circadian Rhythm in Bone Metabolism.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circadian rhythms are fundamental regulators of skeletal homeostasis, coordinating osteoblast and osteoclast activity through tightly controlled temporal programs. Disruption of these rhythms, whether through environmental misalignment or genetic perturbation of core clock components, alters bone formation, enhances resorption, and contributes to skeletal fragility. This review synthesizes current knowledge on circadian regulation of bone biology across in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro model systems, highlighting how each platform reveals distinct aspects of rhythmic gene expression, cellular function, and tissue-level remodeling. We critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of these models, outline key controversies such as the interpretation of global clock-gene knockouts, and discuss the emerging relevance of human-derived systems including iPSC-based models, organoids, and microphysiological "bone-on-chip" platforms. Integrative approaches that combine multiple model systems provide the most reliable framework for understanding circadian control of bone and for identifying targets for chronotherapeutic intervention. Advancing human-relevant models and refining temporal experimental design will be essential for translating circadian biology into clinical strategies for metabolic bone diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.