ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Culturally Responsive Pediatric Rehabilitation Interventions: A Scoping Review.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Culturally responsive frameworks are essential for delivering equitable rehabilitation services to diverse communities. Culturally informed practices that use evidence-based strategies facilitate holistic, family-centered interventions. This scoping review explores the literature published over the last 5 years on barriers and facilitators to the use of culturally responsive interventions for children and families receiving pediatric rehabilitation services. Databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL Complete, Medline, Cochrane Library, and OTseeker. Search terms included cultural competence, culturally informed, culturally grounded, pediatrics, rehabilitation, physical therapy, occupational therapy, barriers, facilitators, and a combination of these terms. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Published intervention studies that identified the barriers and facilitators of culturally responsive care were included in this review. Data from presentations, non-peer-reviewed literature, published abstracts, and dissertations were excluded. Ten studies were included, two Level III, three Level IV, and five Level V, according to the commonly accepted research Levels of Evidence. The outcomes of these studies suggest that rehabilitation providers should consider how to implement tailored, culturally informed interventions to improve holistic, accessible care for all communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.