ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
In-Class AI Use and Attitudes Among University Students: The Different Mediating Roles of Cognitive Relief and Cognitive Offloading.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Telling Students to Evaluate Does Not Make It Happen: Task Stage, Offloading Tendency, and Error Detection in AI-Assisted Student Writing.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- In-class AI usage and university students' attitudes: The mediating role of perceived learning engagement benefits.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AI use is associated with both cognitive relief and cognitive offloading, leading to uncertainty in how users make value judgments and decisions. This study focuses on in-class AI use and explores the perceptions of cognitive relief and cognitive offloading among university students, as well as the distinct mediating mechanisms through which these factors shape the attitudes of students. Based on questionnaire data from 287 respondents, structural equation modeling and bootstrap methods were employed to test the research hypotheses. The results show that cognitive relief exerts a complementary mediating effect between AI use and attitudes, whereas cognitive offloading functions as a competitive mediator. The two mechanisms produce opposing effects on students, with cognitive relief demonstrating a stronger overall mediating effect. These findings suggest that educators should guide students toward a more nuanced understanding of AI use to mitigate confusion and its potential negative psychological consequences. Moreover, educators and institutions should leverage AI to provide cognitive relief for higher-order learning activities, thereby enhancing the engagement, motivation, and deeper learning processes of students, while simultaneously implementing reflective and critical thinking practices to guard against the risks of cognitive offloading. This study is limited by its single-institution convenience sample and reliance on self-reported data; future research incorporating qualitative methods such as interviews and classroom observations is encouraged to further validate and extend these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.