Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42352835›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Using Generative AI in Learning and Students' Innovative Behavior: A Dual-Path Examination Based on the UTAUT Model.

Lingyi Huang, Wenhao Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lingyi HuangSchool of Economics and Management, North China University of Technology, No. 5 Jinyuanzhuang Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100144, China.
Wenhao LuoSchool of Economics and Management, North China University of Technology, No. 5 Jinyuanzhuang Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100144, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4228-5203

Funding

Beijing Municipal Education Commission CDEB25491North China University of Technology Teaching Research Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has exerted extensive and far-reaching impacts on college students' learning, making it a topic worthy of in-depth investigation. This study aims to explore the impact of GAI usage on college students' innovative learning behaviors, drawing on the theoretical framework of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Specifically, the research explores the mediating mechanisms of effort expectancy and performance expectancy, as well as the moderating role of growth mindset in this process. Based on a sample of 430 Chinese college students recruited from diverse academic majors, the proposed moderated mediation model is empirically examined through latent structural equation modeling analysis. The results indicate that using GAI in learning significantly enhances students' perceptions of effort expectancy and performance expectancy, thereby fostering their subsequent innovative behavior. Notably, the findings reveal that while performance expectancy mediates the relationship between GAI usage and innovative behavior, a growth mindset weakens this indirect pathway. The practical implications of this study are also discussed for both students and universities.

Indexed as

effort expectancygrowth mindsetinnovative behaviorperformance expectancyuse of GAI

Identifiers

PMID42352835
PMCPMC13295479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.