Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42352820›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Does Leader AI-Focused Attention Promote Employee Proactivity? A Work-Related Rumination Theory Perspective.

Lu Xiao, Heng Zhao, Jin Wan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lu XiaoSchool of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.
Heng ZhaoSchool of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7344-4329
Jin WanSchool of Economics and Management, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China.

Funding

the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2025YJS124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing embeddedness of AI robots and other intelligent technologies in organizational workplaces, leader AI-focused attention has emerged as an important reference point for employees as they use and adapt to AI-related technologies. Drawing on work-related rumination theory, this study develops and tests an integrated mediation model to examine how leader AI-focused attention is related to employee proactive behavior through two parallel pathways: problem-solving pondering and affective rumination. It further investigates the moderating role of AI job role clarity. Based on structural equation modeling of multi-wave survey data from 514 employees, the results show that leader AI-focused attention positively predicts employees' problem-solving pondering and affective rumination. Problem-solving pondering is positively related to employee proactive behavior, whereas affective rumination is negatively related to employee proactive behavior. In addition, AI job role clarity positively moderates the relationship between leader AI-focused attention and problem-solving pondering; specifically, this positive relationship is stronger when employees report higher AI job role clarity. From the perspective of work-related rumination, this study extends the explanation of the psychological mechanisms linking leader AI-focused attention to employee proactive behavior. It also provides theoretical insights and practical implications for understanding the boundary condition of leaders' attentional signals in AI-related work contexts and for supporting employee proactive behavior.

Indexed as

affective ruminationAI job role clarityleader AI-focused attentionproactive behaviorproblem-solving pondering

Identifiers

PMID42352820
PMCPMC13295751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.