ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Developing and Validating a Context-Sensitive Scale of Excellence-Driven Behavior in Public Universities: A Mixed-Methods Psychometric Study.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative behavioral research depends on clear construct specification and psychometrically sound measurement tools, especially when emerging constructs are examined in context-sensitive organizational settings. This study developed and validated a scale of excellence-driven behavior among faculty and staff in Chinese public universities. A mixed-methods measurement-development design was used. First, the construct domain was derived from Excellence-Driven theory and contextualized within public universities. Second, qualitative evidence from semi-structured interviews and open-ended questionnaires using the Critical Incident Technique was used to generate and refine behavioral indicators. Third, the resulting instrument was examined through item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability and validity assessment. The findings supported a two-dimensional structure consisting of Excellence-Driven Cognition and Learning and Excellence-Driven Display. The scale showed acceptable evidence of internal structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity between the two dimensions, and preliminary criterion-related validity. These results provide initial psychometric support for the use of the scale in future research on excellence-driven behavior among faculty and staff in Chinese public universities, while further evidence regarding temporal stability, measurement invariance, and broader empirical distinction from adjacent constructs is still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.