Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42352763›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Development and Preliminary Validation of College Students' Perceived Public Health Crisis Scale.

Cheng Cheng, Qingling Wang, Xiao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cheng ChengSchool of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5829-6014
Qingling WangSchool of Nursing and Health Management, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China.
Xiao ChenSchool of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.

Funding

Shanghai Municipal Education Commission 2023ZSD011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health crises may profoundly affect college students, but there is a lack of instruments specifically designed to assess their perceptions of such events. This study aimed to develop and preliminarily validate the College Students' Perceived Public Health Crisis Scale (CSPHCS), a measure designed to assess college students' perceptions of public health crises. The scale development followed a multistage process including item generation through literature review and student interviews, expert review, cognitive interviewing, pilot testing, and psychometric evaluation using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Data were collected using an electronic questionnaire administered to college students. Exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor, 16-item structure comprising: (1) perceived impact and personal anxiety, (2) perceived likelihood of crisis occurrence and infection, and (3) confidence in preparedness and information trust. Confirmatory factor analysis provided partial support for the three-factor model, with acceptable RMSEA and SRMR but CFI and TLI slightly below conventional thresholds. Internal consistency was acceptable for the overall scale and its subscales (Cronbach's α = 0.758-0.804). The CSPHCS provides preliminary evidence of content validity, internal consistency, and construct validity as a measure of college students' perceptions of public health crises. Further studies are needed to refine the scale and examine its stability, predictive utility, and applicability across diverse contexts.

Indexed as

college studentscrisis perceptionfactor analysishealth concernsscale validation

Identifiers

PMID42352763
PMCPMC13295727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.