Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42352761›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Impact of Women's Opportunity Costs on Household Fertility Decisions: Evidence from China.

Jingfeng Xu, Laile Tang, Qijun Huang, Xiaojia Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jingfeng XuSchool of Insurance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China.
Laile TangSchool of Insurance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China.
Qijun HuangSchool of Insurance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China.
Xiaojia WangSchool of Insurance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a core component of childbearing costs, women's opportunity costs provide a crucial perspective for explaining the current decline in fertility rates. Recognizing the reciprocal causality between women's opportunity costs and fertility decisions, this study examines their statistical correlation using micro-level data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Building on these empirical insights, we develop a household fertility decision-making model that incorporates women's opportunity costs, calibrating the parameters through structural estimation to quantitatively explore its impact on fertility choices. The quantitative empirical findings reveal a significantly negative correlation between women's opportunity costs and the actual number of children in a household. The theoretical analysis demonstrates that an intensifying motherhood penalty and prolonged career interruptions due to childbirth both lead to a reduction in the equilibrium number of children. Furthermore, higher educational attainment and increasing child-rearing costs exert a pronounced inhibitory effect on fertility intentions. Policy simulations further indicate that, compared to short-term or one-off incentives, continuous fertility subsidies and the implementation of free childcare policies are more effective in offsetting opportunity costs and boosting household fertility intentions.

Indexed as

life-cycle modelpopulation sustainabilitywomen’s opportunity costs

Identifiers

PMID42352761
PMCPMC13296346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.