ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Impact of Women's Opportunity Costs on Household Fertility Decisions: Evidence from China.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a core component of childbearing costs, women's opportunity costs provide a crucial perspective for explaining the current decline in fertility rates. Recognizing the reciprocal causality between women's opportunity costs and fertility decisions, this study examines their statistical correlation using micro-level data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Building on these empirical insights, we develop a household fertility decision-making model that incorporates women's opportunity costs, calibrating the parameters through structural estimation to quantitatively explore its impact on fertility choices. The quantitative empirical findings reveal a significantly negative correlation between women's opportunity costs and the actual number of children in a household. The theoretical analysis demonstrates that an intensifying motherhood penalty and prolonged career interruptions due to childbirth both lead to a reduction in the equilibrium number of children. Furthermore, higher educational attainment and increasing child-rearing costs exert a pronounced inhibitory effect on fertility intentions. Policy simulations further indicate that, compared to short-term or one-off incentives, continuous fertility subsidies and the implementation of free childcare policies are more effective in offsetting opportunity costs and boosting household fertility intentions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.