ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Impact of Categorical Proximity on Positive and Negative Priming: Evidence from Categorisation and Naming Tasks.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compares the breadth and temporal dynamics of positive and negative priming effects depending on the depth of stimulus processing. Two experiments were conducted using a Naming task (shallow processing) and a semantic Categorisation task into "living/non-living" (deep processing) with varying categorical proximity of the prime and probe. A dissociation between the patterns of positive and negative priming was observed. Positive priming emerged exclusively in the Categorisation task, demonstrated graded sensitivity to categorical proximity, and increased with longer response times, consistent with spreading activation models. Negative priming, by contrast, was observed in both tasks: in the Naming task, it appeared as a stable effect independent of categorical proximity, whereas in the Categorisation task, it manifested as a short-lived effect restricted to fast responses. These findings support the early automatic inhibition account and contradict the predictions of episodic retrieval models. Overall, the results indicate functional differences between positive and negative priming under the present conditions: whereas positive priming appears to implement fine-grained semantic tuning, negative priming serves as a coarse, early inhibitory mechanism operating at the level of generalised representations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.