ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Behavioral Modeling in Weight Management: A Global Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Health Belief Model Applications.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Health Belief Model (HBM) is a foundational framework in weight management research, but its predictive power is often limited by inconsistent measurement of its core constructs. This study systematically investigates how methodological practices and contextual factors shape the explanatory power of HBM in weight management research using an integrated bibliometric and content analysis of 19 articles retrieved from the Web of Science database. In doing so, the study makes three contributions: (i) it maps the intellectual structure and thematic evolution of HBM-based weight management research between 2014 and 2025; (ii) it evaluates how core HBM constructs are operationalized across empirical studies; and (iii) it examines how contextual and institutional factors influence the model's predictive capacity. Bibliometric mapping indicates that the field shows conceptual maturity but remains geographically fragmented, with research concentrated in countries such as China, Iran, and Ethiopia, and limited cross-cultural collaboration. Content analysis reveals an imbalance toward behavioral intention rather than observed behavioral change. Among HBM constructs, self-efficacy emerges as a consistent and modifiable determinant supporting sustained behavior, while cues to action are inconsistently operationalized, limiting their effectiveness. Overall, the reliance on intention-based metrics and regionally bounded research traditions constrains the predictive power of HBM applications in weight management, highlighting the need for context-sensitive, self-efficacy-focused, and autonomy-preserving interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.